Delaney Clause: Press Release 1/12/95
Delaney Clause: Press Release 1/12/95
In Keeping With Court Decision On Delaney Clause, EPA Proposes Revocation Of
Food Additive Regulations For Four Pesticides In Certain Processed Foods
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is proposing to revoke the food
additive regulations (maximum allowable residue level), and therefore likely
reduce some uses, for four pesticides in certain processed foods. The Agency's
action is one of a series of actions resulting from the l992 U.S. Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals decision, which strictly interprets the Delaney clause. The
Delaney clause of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) provides that
no additive may be approved for use in processed food if it is found to induce
cancer in man or animals. The pesticides in today's proposed action were found
to be carcinogenic in laboratory animals.
EPA will work with the manufacturers, the agricultural community, and the United
States Department of Agriculture to help identify safe substitutes for these
pesticides.
The food additive regulations subject to revocation are:
- acephate in food handling establishments (food processing, food manufacturing
and food service such as restaurants);
- triademefon in milled fractions of barley (except flour) and wheat (except
flour);
- iprodione in dried ginseng and raisins; and
- imazalil in citrus oil.
Lynn Goldman, EPA's Assistant Administrator for Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic
Substances, said, "Although these four pesticides posed only a negligible
dietary risk, the court decision requires that we propose this action. We do not
believe that most approved uses of these pesticides will be affected."
Acephate is an insecticide used on cotton, soybeans, vegetables and peanuts.
Triademefon is a fungicide used on grains, fruit trees, grapes and vegetables.
Iprodione is a fungicide used on almonds, a variety of fruits and vegetables,
and peanuts. Imazalil is a fungicide used on barley, bananas, citrus and wheat.
Today's proposed revocations do not address the associated raw food tolerances
(allowable pesticide residues) or registrations for pesticides and uses at
issue.
EPA regulates pesticide residues in food under FFDCA and in l988 adopted a
policy interpreting the Delaney clause as subject to an exception for
carcinogenic pesticides which pose only a negligible risk. The Agency's policy
was challenged in court by the Natural Resources Defense Council and others who
were seeking a "zero risk" interpretation of the Delaney clause. The Court
concluded that the Delaney clause is not subject to the Agency's negligible or
de minimis interpretation (Les vs Reilly). The court's decision applies to all
pesticides which cause cancer in test animals and concentrate during processing.
Public comments may be submitted for 90 days after publication of today's notice
in the Federal Register. Submit comments to: Public Response Section, Field
Operations Division (7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. EPA, 40l M St.
S.W., Washington, D.C. 20460.